Skip to content

Conversation

@e11sy
Copy link
Contributor

@e11sy e11sy commented Jan 8, 2025

This PR is a part of work on new notification model
check related PRs in:

Changes

  • now API does not support ReceiveTypes.ALL , we have ReceiveTypes.SEEN_MORE instead
  • add threshold and thresholdPeriod properties to notificationRule entities
  • update mutations and schemas for new notifications pattern

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 25, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.62%. Comparing base (424edb0) to head (f1ea748).
Report is 17 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #448   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   54.62%   54.62%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines         119      119           
  Branches       10       10           
=======================================
  Hits           65       65           
  Misses         50       50           
  Partials        4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@e11sy e11sy changed the title types(notification-rule): respect new notification model feat(notification-rule): implement new notification pattern Feb 1, 2025
@e11sy e11sy marked this pull request as ready for review February 1, 2025 18:56
@e11sy e11sy merged commit fe24cb3 into master Feb 2, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@e11sy e11sy deleted the update-notification-rule-types branch February 2, 2025 20:21
@neSpecc neSpecc mentioned this pull request Feb 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants